Malpractice vs. Negligence

Negligence is a failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances. In tort law, negligence applies to harm caused by carelessness, not intentional harm.

Malpractice is a type of negligence; it is often called "professional negligence". It occurs when a licensed professional (like a doctor, lawyer or accountant) fails to provide services as per the standards set by the governing body ("standard of care"), subsequently causing harm to the plaintiff.

Cases of negligence or malpractice are filed usually in civil courts to get monetary compensation for mental or physical injuries caused.

Comparison chart

Edit this comparison chart



Definition A type of negligence, where a licensed professional fails to provide services as per standards set by the governing body. Failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances.
Cases filed in Civil Courts Civil Courts
Criteria for proving the case Duty, Breach, Causation and Damages Duty, Breach, Causation and Damages
Example A doctor not performing her duties in accordance with medical standards, resulting in harm being caused to her patient. A driver causing harm to passengers due to his carelessness.

edit Examples

If a driver does not perform her duty to avoid causing foreseeable injuries, it is considered to be an act of negligence. Similarly, a case of medical malpractice occurs when a doctor fails to abide by the standards of his profession, causing injury in the process to the plaintiff. Malpractice lawsuits are most commonly brought against medical and legal professionals.

edit Proving the Case and Awarding Damages

Cases of negligence or malpractice are generally difficult to prove. To win a favorable judgment, a clear causal relationship must be established between the negligent act and the injury caused. There are four elements to proving negligence or malpractice:

The following video explains these concepts:

When proving negligence in cases like car accidents or work injuries, lawyers try to establish that the defendant failed to exercise ordinary discretion that a reasonable person would have taken. In order to prove malpractice, other expert testimony is required to establish that an ordinary professional in the same or similar situation would have acted differently to provide the requisite standard of care, as explained in the video below.

edit References

Share this comparison:

If you read this far, you should follow us:

"Malpractice vs Negligence." Diffen LLC, n.d. Web. 21 May 2015. < >

Related Comparisons Follow Diffen
Top 5 Comparisons
Make Diffen Smarter.

Log in to edit comparisons or create new comparisons in your area of expertise!

Sign up »

Comments: Malpractice vs Negligence

Anonymous comments (3)

June 4, 2014, 12:10pm

My daughter gave Birth and doing the ,birth the bby arm got broken...thanking. about calling a lawyer

— 69.✗.✗.86

March 13, 2014, 4:19pm

Dentist put bracees on daughtrr teeth didn't straighht them been on since2011

— 174.✗.✗.120

February 9, 2013, 2:55pm

malpractice isn't necessarily intentional. Finding a lot of flaws on this site or biases. Losing interest fast

— 76.✗.✗.169


Up next

Libel vs. Slander