Rollei Compactline 202 versus Rollei Sportsline 90 comparison chart
Edit this comparison chartRollei Compactline 202Rollei Sportsline 90
  • current rating is 1.9/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(10 ratings)
  • current rating is 2.95/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(22 ratings)
Resolution 12 Megapixel 9 Megapixel
Sensor size 1/2.33-inch 1/2.3-inch
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Digital zoom Yes Yes
Built-in flash Yes Yes
Video out Yes Yes
Video recording Yes Yes
File formats JPEG JPEG
Firewire port No No
White balance Auto, Cloudy, Daylight, Fluorescent, Incandescent, Manual Auto, Cloudy, Daylight, Fluorescent, Incandescent, Manual
Self-timer Yes Yes
Bluetooth No No
Weight 110 g 119 g
Dimensions 90x56.8x18.8 mm 94x63x24.4 mm
Storage SDHC, Secure Digital SDHC, Secure Digital
Battery Li-Ion 2x AAA
Zoom (wide) 35 mm 45 mm
Maximum resolution 4000x3000 pixels 3968x2976 pixels
Minimum resolution 640x480 pixels 640x480 pixels
Optical zoom Yes No
Auto focus Yes No
Manual focus No No
Flash modes anti red-eye, auto, fill in, off anti red-eye, auto, fill in, off
Aperture priority No No
Shutter priority No No
External flash No No
Exposure compensation -2EV - +2EV with 1/3EV steps -2EV - +2EV with 1/3EV steps
Video sound Yes Yes
Maximum video resolution 720x400 pixels 640x480 pixels
Minimum video resolution 320x240 pixels 320x240 pixels
Frames per second (fps) 30 30
Voice recording No Yes
Optical viewfinder No No
Electronic viewfinder No No
LCD size 3-inch 2.5-inch
LCD monitor Yes Yes
Metering modes Center weighted Center weighted
ISO ratings (light sensitivity) auto auto
Minimum aperture (wide) f2.9 f3

Add content for Rollei Compactline 202 vs. Rollei Sportsline 90 or review and improve the comparison table above.