Rollei Compactline 202 versus Sigma DP1s comparison chart
Edit this comparison chartRollei Compactline 202Sigma DP1s
  • current rating is 1.9/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(10 ratings)
  • current rating is 2.63/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(8 ratings)
Resolution 12 Megapixel 14.06 Megapixel
Sensor size 1/2.33-inch 20.7x13.8mm
Sensor type CCD Foveon X3
Digital zoom Yes Yes
Built-in flash Yes Yes
Video out Yes Yes
Video recording Yes No
File formats JPEG JPEG, RAW, RAW - JPEG
Firewire port No No
White balance Auto, Cloudy, Daylight, Fluorescent, Incandescent, Manual Auto, Cloudy, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent, Incandescent, Manual
Self-timer Yes Yes
Bluetooth No No
Weight 110 g 240 g
Dimensions 90x56.8x18.8 mm 113x60x50 mm
Storage SDHC, Secure Digital SDHC, Secure Digital
Battery Li-Ion Li-Ion
Zoom (wide) 35 mm 28 mm
Maximum resolution 4000x3000 pixels 2640x1760x3 pixels
Minimum resolution 640x480 pixels 1296x864x3 pixels
Optical zoom Yes No
Auto focus Yes Yes
Manual focus No Yes
Flash modes anti red-eye, auto, fill in, off anti red-eye, auto, fill in, off, slow flash
Aperture priority No Yes
Shutter priority No Yes
External flash No No
Exposure compensation -2EV - +2EV with 1/3EV steps -3EV - +3EV with 1/3EV steps
Video sound Yes No
Frames per second (fps) 30 0
Voice recording No No
Optical viewfinder No No
Electronic viewfinder No No
LCD size 3-inch 2.5-inch
LCD monitor Yes Yes
Metering modes Center weighted Center weighted, Matrix, Multi-segment
ISO ratings (light sensitivity) auto auto, 100, 200, 400
Minimum aperture (wide) f2.9 f4

Add content for Rollei Compactline 202 vs. Sigma DP1s or review and improve the comparison table above.