Rollei Sportsline 90 versus Samsung TL225 comparison chart
 | Rollei Sportsline 90 | Samsung TL225 |
|---|
| - current rating is 2.95/5
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
(22 ratings) | - current rating is 2.2/5
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
(5 ratings) |
| Resolution | 9 Megapixel |
12.2 Megapixel |
|---|
| Sensor type | CMOS |
CCD |
|---|
| Digital zoom | Yes |
Yes |
|---|
| Built-in flash | Yes |
Yes |
|---|
| Video out | Yes |
Yes |
|---|
| Video recording | Yes |
Yes |
|---|
| File formats | JPEG |
JPEG |
|---|
| USB port | USB 2.0 Hi-Speed |
USB 2.0 Hi-Speed |
|---|
| Firewire port | No |
No |
|---|
| Self-timer | Yes |
Yes |
|---|
| Bluetooth | No |
No |
|---|
| Dimensions | 94x63x24.4 mm |
99.8x59.8x18.9 mm |
|---|
| Storage | SDHC, Secure Digital |
SDHC, Secure Digital |
|---|
| Battery | 2x AAA |
Li-Ion |
|---|
| Maximum resolution | 3968x2976 pixels |
4000x3000 pixels |
|---|
| Minimum resolution | 640x480 pixels |
1024x768 pixels |
|---|
| Optical zoom | No |
Yes |
|---|
| Auto focus | No |
Yes |
|---|
| Manual focus | No |
Yes |
|---|
| Flash modes | anti red-eye, auto, fill in, off |
anti red-eye, auto, fill in, off, slow flash |
|---|
| Aperture priority | No |
No |
|---|
| Shutter priority | No |
No |
|---|
| External flash | No |
No |
|---|
| Exposure compensation | -2EV - +2EV with 1/3EV steps |
-2EV - +2EV with 1/3EV steps |
|---|
| Video sound | Yes |
Yes |
|---|
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 pixels |
1280x720 pixels |
|---|
| Minimum video resolution | 320x240 pixels |
320x240 pixels |
|---|
| Frames per second (fps) | 30 |
30 |
|---|
| Voice recording | Yes |
Yes |
|---|
| Optical viewfinder | No |
No |
|---|
| Electronic viewfinder | No |
No |
|---|
| LCD size | 2.5-inch |
3.5-inch |
|---|
| LCD monitor | Yes |
Yes |
|---|
| Metering modes | Center weighted |
Center weighted, Matrix, Spot |
|---|
| ISO ratings (light sensitivity) | auto |
auto, |
|---|
Add content for Rollei Sportsline 90 vs. Samsung TL225 or review and improve the comparison table above.