USB 2.0 vs. USB 3.0

USB 2.0
USB 3.0

USB 3.0, the latest version of USB (Universal Serial Bus), provides better speed and more efficient power management than USB 2.0. USB 3.0 is backward compatible with USB 2.0 devices; however, data transfer speeds are limited to USB 2.0 levels when these devices inter-operate.

Comparison chart

Edit this comparison chart

USB 2.0

User Rating (182):
USB 2.0

USB 3.0

User Rating (218):
USB 3.0
Released April 2000 November 2008
Speed High Speed or HS, 480 Mbps (Megabits per second) 10 times faster than USB 2.0. Super Speed or SS, 4.8 Gbps (Giga bits per second)
Signaling Method Polling mechanism i.e can either send or receive data (Half duplex) Asynchronous mechanism i.e. can send and receive data simultaneously (Full duplex)
Price For a similar product, the USB 2.0 version is generally less expensive than it's USB 3.0 version. For a similar product, the USB 3.0 version is generally more expensive than it's USB 2.0 version.
Power Usage Up to 500 mA Up to 900 mA. Allows better power efficiency with less power for idle states. Can power more devices from one hub.
Number of wires within the cable 4 9
Standard-A Connectors Grey in color Blue in color
Standard-B Connectors Smaller in size Extra space for more wires
Max Cable length 5 meters 3 meters

Contents: USB 2.0 vs USB 3.0

A USB 3.0 Memory Stick
A USB 3.0 Memory Stick

edit What is USB 3.0 and USB 2.0?

Universal Serial Bus (USB) is an industry standard developed in the mid-1990s that defines the cables, connectors and communications protocols used in a bus for connection, communication and power supply between computers and electronic devices. Now even devices like smartphones, PDAs and video game consoles are connected to the computers with USB ports allowing recharging and communication thereby replacing the requirement of adapters and power chargers.

USB3.0 was released in November 2008, almost eight years after the release of USB 2.0.

edit USB 3.0 Highlights and Benefits over USB 2.0

When data is being transferred through USB 3.0 Devices, cables and connectors transaction is initiated by the host making a request followed by a response from the device. The device either accepts the request or rejects it. If accepted then device sends data or accepts data from the host. If there is lack of buffer space or data, it responds with a Not Ready (NRDY) signal to tell the host that it is not able to process the request. When the device is ready then, it will send an Endpoint Ready (ERDY) to the host which will then reschedule the transaction.

edit Physical Differences

USB 3.0 Connectors are different from USB 2.0 Connectors and the 3.0 connectors are usually colored blue on the inside in order to distinguish them from the 2.0 connectors.

Various types of USB Connectors (click to enlarge). From Left to Right: Micro USB Type AB, Micro USB Type B, USB 2.0 Type A, USB 2.0 Type B, USB 3.0 Type A, USB 3.0 Type B, USB 3.0 Type Micro B, Min USB Type A connector
Various types of USB Connectors (click to enlarge). From Left to Right: Micro USB Type AB, Micro USB Type B, USB 2.0 Type A, USB 2.0 Type B, USB 3.0 Type A, USB 3.0 Type B, USB 3.0 Type Micro B, Min USB Type A connector

edit Backward Compatible

USB 3.0 is compatible with USB 2.0. However, the USB 3.0 product will perform at the same level as a USB 2.0 product, so speed and power benefits will not be fully realized.

USB 3.0 receptacles are electrically compatible with USB Standard 2.0 device plugs if they physically match. USB 3.0 type-A plugs and receptacles are completely backward compatible, and USB 3.0 type-B receptacles will accept USB 2.0 and earlier plugs. However, USB 3.0 type-B plugs will not fit into USB 2.0 and earlier receptacles.

This means that USB 3.0 cables cannot be used with USB 2.0 and USB 1.1 peripherals, although USB 2.0 cables can be used with USB 3.0 devices, if at USB 2.0 speeds.

Here is a good informational video explaining the various features of USB 3.0 vs USB 2.0:


The following videos review the speed of USB 2.0 vs USB 3.0 products:

edit Price

For a similar product, the USB 3.0 version is generally more expensive than it's USB 2.0 version.

You can check the current prices on Amazon for a few USB 2.0 vs USB 3.0 enabled devices:

edit References

Share this comparison:

If you read this far, you should follow us on:

"USB 2.0 vs USB 3.0." Diffen.com. Diffen LLC, n.d. Web. 2 Oct 2014. < http://www.diffen.com/difference/USB_2.0_vs_USB_3.0 >

Stay informed Related Comparisons
Follow Diffen
Make Diffen Smarter.

Log in to edit comparisons or create new comparisons in your area of expertise!

Sign up »
Top 5 Comparisons Recently Compared

Comments: USB 2.0 vs USB 3.0

Comments via Facebook

Anonymous comments (7)

March 1, 2014, 10:13am

Thank you

— 94.✗.✗.147
2

July 17, 2013, 1:41pm

On a SERIAL connection, such as USB, it is "bits" that are transferred, not "bytes". Thus, the terminology of bps, not Bps, is appropriate, and honest. Congrats and thanks to the presenter for a great tutorial and demo of USB 3.0 and 2.0.

— 65.✗.✗.200
2

October 27, 2013, 1:50pm

excellent information

— 108.✗.✗.188
1

June 28, 2013, 1:50am

Great information. Thank you!

— 64.✗.✗.90
1

December 6, 2013, 8:53pm

Tanks for splaining

— 71.✗.✗.168
0

July 29, 2013, 12:05am

The first anonymous commenter is completely wrong. Today, everything is in "bps" because everything today is being communicated via high-speed serial links. This began with USB1 and the old Firewire. This has become the single most important change in the way things are done across the whole spectrum, as we see in such things as PCI Express, which is the old PCI bus implemented as an array of high-speed serial links.

— 220.✗.✗.153
-2

June 5, 2013, 5:08am

I really wish that the manufacturers would switch from Mbps to MBps! We passed the bits data transfer level back in the 90's but I guess they're still fooling people with the small "b" instead of the capital "B"! It's like making something $1.99 to keep it under $2! Ahhhhhhh...psychology and the easily tricked human mind! Seriously...when are we going to move up the terminology!

— 37.✗.✗.154
-3

share

Up next

FireWire vs. USB