To choose between Emacs and Vim, rate them on the comparison parameters by entering scores (+ve or -ve) in the comparison tool.
The total points are automatically shown in the top row. This should help you decide.
Emacs is a class of feature-rich text editors, usually characterized by their extensibility. Emacs has over 1,000 editing commands. It also allows the user to combine these commands into macros to automate work.
Vim is a text editor first released by Bram Moolenaar in 1991 for the Amiga computer. The name "Vim" is an acronym for "Vi IMproved" because Vim was created as an extended version of the vi editor, with many additional features designed to be helpful
Design by:
Richard Stallman
Bram Moolenaar
Initial release:
1976
1991
Stable release:
22.3 (2008-09-05)
7.2 (2008-08-09)
Buffer tabs:
Supported in both command line and graphical user interface
Supported in both command line and graphical user interface
Preview release:
23
7.2a.13 (2008-07-04)
Written in:
C and Emacs Lisp
C and Vim script
Platform:
Cross-platform, including Unix, Linux and Microsoft Windows
Cross-platform, including Unix, Linux and Microsoft Windows
Emacs and Vim are the two most widely used text editors on Unix and Unix-like systems. There is a long history of competition between these two text editors, which are vastly more advanced than other text editors on the Unix platform. While both editors feature similar functionality through their plugins, scripting, and shortcut keys, their approaches are slightly different.
Vim uses editing modes - most commonly the command mode and insert mode. Vim aims to minimize the number of keystrokes that a user has to press, because vi, upon which Vim is based, was designed to be used over slow terminals.
Emacs uses modifier keys to enable shortcuts, which often involves pressing several keys simultaneously for a single function. This aspect of Emacs is often criticized.
Emacs is easier to learn since it has a more natural interface (for users familiar with GUI-based text editors). Since Vim has different editing modes, beginners find it a little harder to learn.
[edit]Productivity and Editing Speed of Emacs vs Vim
Vim enthusiasts argue that once a user becomes familiar with the editing modes and commands of Vim, it enables far greater productivity and efficiency. File editing is usually faster with Vim than with Emacs because of Vim's purposely speed-driven interface. For example, cursor movement can be controlled through the H, J, K, and L keys in the normal mode. This means the user's hands do not need to leave "home row" position, which improves efficiency. In Emacs (with the default configuration), the user must move the cursor with the Ctrl-B or Ctrl-F shortcuts, which arguably slows the user down since two keys need to be pressed. Productivity and efficiency improvements in Emacs depend upon the configuration of the editing environment rather than the editor itself.
Vim is lighter than Emacs and uses less memory. Vim advocates criticize Emacs' resource consumption with the tongue-in-cheek suggestion that Emacs stands for "Eighty Megabytes And Constantly Swapping".
However, with gnuclient, a single persistent Emacs process can be run that can support several clients simultaneously. This speeds startup time and decreases total memory usage, closing the gap between Emacs and Vim.
[edit]Extensibility and Customization of Emacs vs Vim
While both Vim and Emacs support plugins that enhance their functionality, Emacs supports a lot more customization of the editor environment. This is arguably the most important feature of emacs and is responsible for much of emacs' devoted following.
Emacs can be extended in elisp, while Vim has its own internal scripting language and supports use of other programming languages for plugin development.
Emacs can be extended on the fly by redefining built-in elisp functions, either by typing the new definition into Emacs or by loading elisp files. Groups of related changes are called "modes", and can be easily configured to be automatically used for particular types of files (buffers). So it is easy to define modes for different programming languages or frameworks such as "lisp mode" or "Ruby on Rails mode" or "PHP mode". These modes can directly modify even core behaviors of Emacs, automatically format or colorize text and add standard template or "boilerplate" text such as function declarations and closures. So programmers find Emacs to be far more customizable to their particular requirements than Vim.
Vim can also be extended on the fly by using the command mode. The command mode allows configuration options to be set, functions to be defined, and macros to be made. In fact, configuration files for Vim are just commands that can be input through the command mode.
[edit]Graphical User Interface (GUI) for Emacs vs Vim
Both Vim and Emacs have graphical user interfaces. Virtually all menu items on the graphical interface for both editors are simply ways to handle a shortcut command or quick configuration. The GUIs for the editors do not provide virtually any additional functions beyond those available in the CLI (command line interface)
Emacs uses XDisplay or gtk2 for its GUI. Vim can use many other GUI libraries, such as gtk, gnome, gnome2, motif, athena and neXtaw, in addition to gtk2.
