Hypothesis vs. Theory

A hypothesis is either a suggested explanation for an observable phenomenon, or a reasoned prediction of a possible causal correlation among multiple phenomena. In science, a theory is a tested, well-substantiated, unifying explanation for a set of verified, proven hypotheses. A theory is always backed by evidence; a hypothesis is only a suggested possible outcome, and is testable and falsifiable.


Comparison chart

Edit this comparison chart

Hypothesis

Theory

Definition A suggested explanation for an observable phenomenon or prediction of a possible causal correlation among multiple phenomena. In science, a theory is a well-substantiated, unifying explanation for a set of verified, proven hypotheses.
Based on Suggestion, possibility, projection or prediction, but the result is uncertain. Certainty, evidence, verification, repeated testing.
Testable Yes Yes
Falsifiable Yes Yes
Is well substantiated No Yes
Data Usually based on very limited data Based on a very wide set of data tested under various circumstances.
Instance Specific: Hypothesis is usually based on a very specific observation and is limited to that instance. General: A theory is the establishment of a general principle through multiple tests and experiments, and this principle may apply to various specific instances.

edit Examples of Theory and Hypothesis

Theory: Einstein's Theory of Relativity. This is a theory because it has been tested innumerable times, verified, and the result invariably only verifies the conclusion.

Hypothesis: If a prisoner learns a work skill while in jail, it is less likely that she will commit a crime when released. This is a hypothesis, because it just makes sense to the logical mind, but there's no evidence this will happen time and again with exactly the same result.

This video further explains the difference between a theory and a hypothesis:

edit Common Misconception

People often tend to say "theory" when what they're actually talking about is a hypothesis. For instance, "Migraines are caused by drinking coffee after 2 p.m. - well, it's just a theory, not a rule."

This is actually a logically reasoned proposal based on an observation - say 2 instances of drinking coffee after 2 p.m. caused a migraine - but even if this were true, the migraine could have actually been caused by some other factors.

Because this observation is merely a reasoned possibility, it is testable and can be falsified - which makes it a hypothesis, not a theory.

edit References

Share this comparison:

If you read this far, you should follow us on:

"Hypothesis vs Theory." Diffen.com. Diffen LLC, n.d. Web. 24 Oct 2014. < http://www.diffen.com/difference/Hypothesis_vs_Theory >

Related Comparisons Follow Diffen
Make Diffen Smarter.

Log in to edit comparisons or create new comparisons in your area of expertise!

Sign up »
Top 5 Comparisons

Comments: Hypothesis vs Theory

Comments via Facebook

Anonymous comments (2)

May 6, 2014, 11:45pm

"Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things."
this statement is poorly formed because it implies that a thing is a theory until it gets proven and then it is somehow promoted to fact. this is just a misunderstanding of what the words mean, and of how science progresses generally.

to say that a theory is inherently dubious because "it isn't a fact" is pretty much a meaningless statement. no expression which qualified as a mere fact could do a very good job of explaining the complicated process by which species have arisen on Earth over the last billion years. in fact, if you claimed that you could come up with such a single fact, now THAT would be dubious!

everything we observe in nature supports the theory of evolution, and nothing we observe contradicts it. when you can say this about a theory, it's a pretty fair bet that the theory is correct.

— 71.✗.✗.151
0

October 11, 2013, 1:11pm

"In science, a theory is a well-substantiated, unifying explanation for a set of verified, proven hypotheses."

But there's no such thing as "proven hypotheses". Hypotheses can be tested/falsified, they can't be "proven". That's just not how science works. Logical deductions based on axioms can be proven, but not scientific hypotheses.

On top of that I find it somewhat strange to claim that a theory doesn't have to be testable, if it's built up from hypotheses, which DO have to be testable...

— 80.✗.✗.139
-1

share

Up next

Arbitrarily Large vs. Sufficiently Large